Higher Education Reform: An Innovative Approach to Improving the Quality of Campus Education in Indonesia

Authors

  • Afandi Afandi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Al-Ibrohimy Bangkalan Author
  • Yusuf Yusuf International Islamic Univesity Malaysia Translator

Keywords:

Higher education reform, Innovation, Quality of education, Technology integration, Curriculum, Student engagement.

Abstract

Higher education reform in Indonesia is a crucial strategic step in facing globalization challenges and the ever-changing dynamics of the labor market. In this context, innovative approaches are essential for enhancing the quality of campus education. This study explores the integration of technology in learning, the development of a curriculum responsive to industry needs, and the application of interactive and experience-based teaching methods. Additionally, the research examines the role of government policies in supporting these reforms and the importance of collaboration between educational institutions and the industrial sector to create relevant and adaptive programs. Through surveys and interviews with various stakeholders, including faculty, students, and campus administrators, the study finds that student engagement in the learning process and continuous evaluation are key to ensuring higher educational quality. The findings indicate that effective reform not only produces graduates prepared to face challenges in the job market but also develops individuals who can positively contribute to society. Therefore, this research provides recommendations to strengthen the commitment of all stakeholders to realize a higher education system that is more qualified, inclusive, and competitive at both national and international levels.

References

Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 15-44). Athabasca University Press.

Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.

Bakar, N. A., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Kewirausahaan dalam pendidikan tinggi: Strategi dan tantangan. Jurnal Kewirausahaan, 8(2), 115-130.

Baker, R. K., et al. (2017). The impact of faculty engagement on student success. Journal of Higher Education, 88(6), 811-835.

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. In T. L. Good (Ed.), The 21st century classroom: Teaching and learning in a digital age (pp. 11-65). Routledge.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC.

Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2018). Universities and regional economic development: A review of the evidence. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 41(2), 53-71.

Burgstahler, S. (2015). Equal access: Universal design of online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 1-23.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teaching in the Flat World: Learning from High-Performing Systems. Teacher College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2017). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 5-50.

Davis, S. (2019). The impact of interactive technology on student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 34-47.

Eisenberg, D., Gollust, S. E., Golberstein, E., & Hefner, J. (2009). The impact of mental health on academic performance: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 628-644.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology use as a function of pedagogical beliefs: A development approach. Computers & Education, 55(2), 423-430.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 1-10.

Gonzalez, C., et al. (2020). E-learning platforms: Bridging the gap in education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 56-72.

Gonzalez, M. (2019). Faculty support and student engagement: A qualitative study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 273-285.

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer.

Grindley, P., & Teece, D. J. (2018). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and technology in the global economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 943-965.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.

Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Education Endowment Foundation.

Huang, Y., et al. (2020). The role of university-industry collaboration in enhancing innovation performance: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120272.

Kelley, M. J., & Knowles, J. (2016). Real-time feedback in online learning: A study of best practices. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(2), 45-57.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan tahunan pendidikan tinggi 2020. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.

Miller, A., & Beech, B. (2018). Academic support services: A student perspective. Journal of Academic Affairs, 12(1), 45-62.

Miller, M. D. (2014). The innovative educator: How to teach with technology. Pearson.

Nasution, S., & Lestari, F. (2020). Kualitas pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia: Analisis dan strategi peningkatan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 26(2), 85-98.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson.

Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Geographies of educational mobilities: Exploring the uneven flows of international students. Theorizing Educational Mobilities, 36(3), 271-291.

Roberts, K., et al. (2018). Skills development in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Education and Work, 31(3), 237-253.

Rogers, E. M., & McCaffrey, M. (2021). The role of higher education in fostering innovation: An overview of the literature. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(1), 1-17.

Rohman, A., & Zainuddin, M. (2021). Inovasi dalam pendidikan tinggi: Pendekatan dan implementasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 5(3), 204-219.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Development of self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and practice. Springer.

Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2021). Peer tutoring and academic success: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 16, 100-112.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.

Stevens, K., et al. (2020). Student perceptions of academic support services: A qualitative study. Journal of College Student Development, 61(4), 517-533.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2019). Pendidikan tinggi di era globalisasi: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 1-15.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation.

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press.

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.

White, P., & Smith, R. (2019). Physical resources and student satisfaction: A survey study. Journal of Facilities Management, 17(2), 114-128.

World Bank. (2021). Higher education in Indonesia: A sector review. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zainal, A., & Syahrul, M. (2022). Peran teknologi dalam pendidikan tinggi: Implikasi bagi pengembangan kurikulum. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 15(1), 45-60.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Higher Education Reform: An Innovative Approach to Improving the Quality of Campus Education in Indonesia. (2025). Sabiluna: Journal Education and Management, 1(1), 37-50. https://badruddininstitut.or.id/jurnal/index.php/sabiluna/article/view/19